Talk:Woman on top

Wikipedia is not censored.
Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image.

Sexology and sexuality Mid‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies

Archives

Archive 1

Tagged as { { globalize } }

See my recent comments at Talk:Missionary position. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 03:47, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As I said there: per the template's help page, This tag should only be applied to articles where global perspectives are reasonably believed to exist (e.g., that people in China have a different view about an idea or situation than people in Germany or South Africa).. Without evidence of that, the tag is not needed. What evidence is there that people in these places view this topic differently? Crossroads ^-talk- 18:58, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RfC: Amazon position spinoff

Amazon position currently redirects here and casually mentioned once. However, the topic has been covered in numerous reliable sources, and it is an important woman on top position. I believe there is opportunity to expand on the topic in this page, and also change the redirect page into an actual spinoff page. Sir Kenneth Kho (talk) 17:27, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article isn't that long (a bit overloaded with pictures, but we can fix that) and I can't imagine an amazon position article would be that long either. Seems to make more sense to include it here. Crossroads ^-talk- 00:03, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Credit in caption

The edit summary in this edit, "we don't credit individual wikimedian pseudonyms in image captions. We do credit famous artists by their actual names, when relevant" sees to be contrary to MOS:CREDITS, which says that "If the artist or photographer is independently notable, then a wikilink to their biography may be appropriate". If the artist has a Wikipedia article, then they are notable. Note that it was a link to the artist's article, not their user page. Green Montanan (talk) 20:01, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]